zevOS

01Case study · Hotels & hospitality

Guest, staff and public charging on the same eight bays

Charging was installed because guests asked. Two years later nobody could say whether it was earning or losing.

Hospitality groupNine properties, North and West IndiaComposite scenario
  • 9

    Properties

  • 3

    Audiences on the same hardware

  • 0

    Dedicated headcount

The deployment

Profile

Mix
AC destination charging, two properties with DC
Audiences
Overnight guests, staff, and passing public
Operations
Front desk and facilities, no charging specialists

The problem

What was in the way

  1. 01Guests expected charging bundled with the room; the public expected to pay; staff expected a subsidy. All three used the same bays.
  2. 02Electricity cost sat in the facilities budget with no way to attribute it to any of the three.
  3. 03Bays were occupied overnight by cars that had finished charging by 1am.
  4. 04Nobody at property level was going to learn a charging console.

The approach

What was actually done

Each step names the mechanism rather than the outcome, so you can judge whether it would transfer to your situation.

01

Three audiences, three prices, one connector

Driver groups carry the tariff. Guests charge against the room at a bundled rate, staff at a subsidised one, the public at full retail — with no separate hardware and nothing for the driver to remember.

02

Idle fees, timed to the property

An idle fee after a grace period keeps bays circulating during the day, waived overnight where nobody is waiting and the penalty would serve no purpose.

03

Front desk gets a narrow view

Property staff hold operate-level access to their own property only — enough to start, stop and reset a charger and clear a bay, with everything they do recorded.

04

Cost recovery made visible

Per-property energy and revenue reporting shows what each audience consumed and what it returned, which turned a facilities line item into a P&L conversation.

The outcome

What changed

  • Electricity cost recovered without cross-subsidy between guests, staff and the public.
  • Daytime bays turning over; overnight guests undisturbed.
  • Property teams handling routine resets without a specialist.
  • A per-property number the group finance team can actually read.

Would the same approach work for you?

Tell us your constraints and we will say honestly which parts of this transfer and which do not.