zevOS

01Case study · Housing societies

Resident charging billed to the flat, not to the sinking fund

Sixty residents with EVs, one common electricity meter, and a managing committee meeting that came round every month.

Residential societyGated community, Tier-1 cityComposite scenario
  • 60+

    Resident EVs

  • 1

    Common connection

  • Monthly

    Billed with maintenance

The deployment

Profile

Hardware
AC points in basement parking, one per allotted bay
Audiences
Residents, their guests, and society staff vehicles
Governance
Managing committee, no technical staff

The problem

What was in the way

  1. 01Charging drew from the common connection, so every resident was subsidising the ones with EVs.
  2. 02The sanctioned load could not serve every bay at full power simultaneously.
  3. 03Guests and residents used the same points and could not be told apart.
  4. 04The committee needed a statement it could defend at a general body meeting.

The approach

What was actually done

Each step names the mechanism rather than the outcome, so you can judge whether it would transfer to your situation.

01

Billed to the flat, not the fund

Residents charge against a driver group tied to their unit; sessions accumulate to a monthly statement that goes out with maintenance dues instead of being absorbed by the common bill.

02

Load shared across the basement

Available capacity is distributed across active sessions and returned to the pool as cars finish, so more bays were wired than the sanction could serve simultaneously.

03

Guests pay the visitor rate

Guest sessions run through the QR flow at a visitor price with no account needed, which also stopped guests occupying resident bays overnight.

04

A statement the committee can read

Per-connector energy and cost recovery, presented plainly enough to be circulated without a covering explanation.

The outcome

What changed

  • Electricity cost sits with the residents who used it.
  • More bays served than the sanctioned load would allow uncontrolled.
  • Guests charged at a visitor rate without a signup.
  • The monthly argument replaced by a statement.

Would the same approach work for you?

Tell us your constraints and we will say honestly which parts of this transfer and which do not.